<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Computing &#8212; Part 2: TouchSmart PC &amp; Windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-08/</link>
	<description>Free Computer Training &#38; News Brought To You By Train Signal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:38:48 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-08/comment-page-1/#comment-43054</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-09/#comment-43054</guid>
		<description>I actually just passed the 70-620 and I expect that certification to be viable for quite sometime.  Think about it like this:  Did Vista bury XP?  Did XP bury Windows 2000 or Windows 98?  

I think the reason Windows 7 is so &quot;hyped&quot; is because a lot of people refuse to give Vista a chance or don&#039;t like Vista.  One of the biggest differences you will see with Windows 7 is that it will be extremely scaled down in comparison to Vista.  A real issue with Vista is that hardware developers didn&#039;t keep up with the demands Vista places on your hardware requirements.  Windows 7 is going to eliminate this issue.  Also, there will be several security refinements that will be a slight upgrade from Vista.  You can take a look at other features at this Windows 7 site: http://windows7news.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually just passed the 70-620 and I expect that certification to be viable for quite sometime.  Think about it like this:  Did Vista bury XP?  Did XP bury Windows 2000 or Windows 98?  </p>
<p>I think the reason Windows 7 is so &#8220;hyped&#8221; is because a lot of people refuse to give Vista a chance or don&#8217;t like Vista.  One of the biggest differences you will see with Windows 7 is that it will be extremely scaled down in comparison to Vista.  A real issue with Vista is that hardware developers didn&#8217;t keep up with the demands Vista places on your hardware requirements.  Windows 7 is going to eliminate this issue.  Also, there will be several security refinements that will be a slight upgrade from Vista.  You can take a look at other features at this Windows 7 site: <a href="http://windows7news.com/" rel="nofollow">http://windows7news.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kunal D Mehta</title>
		<link>http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-08/comment-page-1/#comment-42691</link>
		<dc:creator>Kunal D Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-09/#comment-42691</guid>
		<description>Windows 7 as early as 2009 ?
So will it be a Vista Killer ?

So what will people who have just passed 70-620: Configuring Windows Vista Certification exam be worthless ?
Apart from the multipoint touch interface, whats new in Windows 7 which is giving it so much hype and also Microsoft is planning to bury Vista for it ?
And what about the price tag ?
Will it be affordable for people like me ? Poor IT dudes ? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows 7 as early as 2009 ?<br />
So will it be a Vista Killer ?</p>
<p>So what will people who have just passed 70-620: Configuring Windows Vista Certification exam be worthless ?<br />
Apart from the multipoint touch interface, whats new in Windows 7 which is giving it so much hype and also Microsoft is planning to bury Vista for it ?<br />
And what about the price tag ?<br />
Will it be affordable for people like me ? Poor IT dudes ? ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-08/comment-page-1/#comment-35298</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-09/#comment-35298</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m envisioning a desktop sized iphone on steroids here!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m envisioning a desktop sized iphone on steroids here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-08/comment-page-1/#comment-35043</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-09/#comment-35043</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s good to hear that the TouchSmart 2 has the multiple touches capability.  Some of the research for this article was done before the release of the TouchSmart 2, which was about a month ago, so I didn&#039;t have some of the info on the new release.  Thanks for your update!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good to hear that the TouchSmart 2 has the multiple touches capability.  Some of the research for this article was done before the release of the TouchSmart 2, which was about a month ago, so I didn&#8217;t have some of the info on the new release.  Thanks for your update!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drivebyposter</title>
		<link>http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-08/comment-page-1/#comment-35039</link>
		<dc:creator>drivebyposter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-09/#comment-35039</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading your commentary, but would like to point out that the Touchsmart 2 DOES support multiple touches, see the videos showing the primary touchsmart ribbon being resized with two fingers. I also know this to be the case because I designed parts of the touchscreen :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading your commentary, but would like to point out that the Touchsmart 2 DOES support multiple touches, see the videos showing the primary touchsmart ribbon being resized with two fingers. I also know this to be the case because I designed parts of the touchscreen :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn Marentette</title>
		<link>http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-08/comment-page-1/#comment-34951</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn Marentette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.trainsignaltraining.com/future-of-computing-2/2008-09-09/#comment-34951</guid>
		<description>I have a new TouchSmart PC, and I spent some time playing with FotoViewr, which responds to the embedded Tablet PC gestures when you move around your pictures in 3D space:

http://www.fotoviewr.com/

Another fun place for touch-screen interaction is the National Gallery of Art&#039;s kids website:

http://www.nga.gov/kids/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a new TouchSmart PC, and I spent some time playing with FotoViewr, which responds to the embedded Tablet PC gestures when you move around your pictures in 3D space:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fotoviewr.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fotoviewr.com/</a></p>
<p>Another fun place for touch-screen interaction is the National Gallery of Art&#8217;s kids website:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nga.gov/kids/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nga.gov/kids/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
